Maybe someone here has already experienced Дhnliches?
My son, 9 years old, has the third grade, unfortunately with a miserable witness (only threes and fours) completed what zurьckzufьhren to a combination of lower demand and ADS symptoms.
Me lit so a that it e.g. got a four in math because he just does not have the ausgefьllt Hдlfte of tasks in two class tests (Grade Four) plus poorly worked in class, and homework цfter "to forget" Has.
For some time, however, the suspicion drдngt to me that the teacher adversely affected him by destructive remarks, shouting and BloЯstellen front of the class.
In previous testimony, even in the last six months, they still noticed at least his eloquence and his extensive vocabulary.
And now she claims under the item "Statements informed about the learning development and performance level" be that "Vocabulary not altersgemдЯ" be!
There was also a Bemekung informed about his Lesefдhigkeiten that I do not consider closed for applicable.
Since the nдchste testimony already informed about the Admission to a school weiterfьhrenden decides I can do this, what affects me as an act of revenge, just do not leave sitting on my child.
The HAWIK IV has certified an IQ of 132 in the area Sprachverstдndnis few months ago. The teacher and the school board, I send a copy of the test result.
He also informed about verfьgt to recognize items and to represent what many people whether Pдdagogen, Mьtter or people he simply unterhдlt zufдllig, auffдllt an immediate general knowledge and a Vermцgen; I have been asked about it ever since the kindergarten цfters.
So I have not signed the certificate copy which brought my son, but given him a letter to the teacher, in which I made reference to their widersprьchlichen statements in the last two products, as well as the test.
My son erzдhlte me that this teacher has now said they will not read the letter, but attach only one file. "Your mother sees you just different" still have it said, and it just was his problem, if not get the original testimony because of the lack of signature on the copy.
According to the legal remedies on the Rьckseite the testimony of opposition may be lodged actually only against non-promotion of individual notes or assessments is not mentioned.
WeiЯ anybody know if I have a chance to assert myself and get a new Ausfьhrung of the testimony? I mean to simply prevent the teacher to allow such obvious false statements on the decisive nдchsten testimony.
In purely legal terms should initially by the competent witness for adoption Your State study, for example,
"In minderjдhrigen Schьlerinnen and Schьlern a legal guardian or legal guardian bestдtigt by signing the acknowledgment of the testimony. Volljдhrige Schьlerinnen or schoolboys bestдtigen the acknowledgment itself by signature. The class teacher or the class teacher make sure that the acknowledgment was bestдtigt. "
"The ratings in the Fдchern are set by the subject teacher or the subject teacher. Comes the head teacher or the school principal or the majority of the voting members of the Class Council considers that a teacher when issuing a report mark injured a conference decision informed about Grundsдtze closed for the performance evaluation or verstoЯen against laws or regulations, generally accepted pдdagogische Grundsдtze or BewertungsmaЯstдbe has or has gone out of inaccurate assumptions or irrelevant Erwдgungen, the teacher must be given an opportunity to comment. If consensus can not be reached, says the head teacher or the principal of the zustдndigen Schulbehцrde and asks for Ьberprьfung the evaluation."
"The detained on the certificates assessments are made on the basis of observations in the classroom and on mьndlichen, written and other subject-specific learning controls. They relate to the learning development and performance of Schьlerin or Schьlers in which is stated on the testimony of the reporting period. ... performance assessments that are closed for advising Schьlerinnen and Schьlern and their guardians, closed for the certificate issuing of import shall be recorded regelmдЯig. It remains ьberlassen the individual teacher if she wants to make the records in free or structured form. It must be ensured that the ratings on the certificates are gestьtzt in a comprehensible manner on such records kцnnen. "
Say: The 'refused' signature does not benefit anyone, and notes myself only about principals are changed. The teacher, however, obliged to justify the note, which, for example, with large differences. written work and final grade betw the case would be.
seen personally a dispute with the school / teacher does not pay most and the children are the victims.
More important would be M.E. Consistent promotion of deficits, so that the teacher in the fourth grade can be no handle for the poor grades. When he writes in 2 math works just a '4', as it can no overall grade '2' to give. I would witness thus seen more as a warning and try WITH the teacher to improve the situation rather than anzukaempfen against them.
No, it's all here me not about the notes, but the clearly false statement that my son was not informed about a verfьge altersgemдЯen vocabulary.
As I said, the teacher thus contradicts itself, lдsst an intelligence test and the obvious auЯer night.
Such an assertion on the nдchsten testimony wьrde give the impression to the teachers of nдchsten school that it was not just about a child with mittelmдЯigen school performance, but an intellectually less gifted, and mцglicherweise cause only schools I not choose wьrde ready wдren take him.
Natьrlich I see the emphasis is to balance its deficits. He already makes Heipдdagogik and a group psychotherapy focusing social behavior. In addition I leave him at weekends and now tдglich lцsen tasks during the holidays to its working position (do only what is interesting ... to improve.
Nevertheless, it is a clear insult to associate the few obvious Stдrken my son vorsдtzlich the contrary, I will not be sitting on it from Grьnden mentioned.
As I said, the teacher thus contradicts itself, lдsst an intelligence test and the obvious auЯer night.the Testergenis's first irrelevant. Actually, even vцllig matter. what's in it. Apparently your son verhдlt at school different than at home. The teacher should mark your son so that they tell you what his performance in school. And not that what kцnnte stuck it to him.
Your son seems to have more problems by ADS. Even if he has a high value in Sprachverstдndnis according HAWIK that does not heiЯen that he can implement it. The test measures the Mцglichkeiten the your son is given, but not the tatsдchlichen status at school.
I wьrde because very very strongly recommend a persцnlichen Gesprдch with KL.
The HAWIK IV has certified an IQ of 132 in the area Sprachverstдndnis few months ago. The teacher and the school board, I send a copy of the test result.Have you talked to at the time of the school / teacher, or have you just sat there send copy? Have you and the teacher developed a plan to help your son? Somehow it has indeed been problems that have gefьhrt for tests. How bad is because Verhдltnis about? Was communication frьher better?
I wьrde me quickly apologize closed for your response and search together with the KL for a compromise ..
What have you or rather your child them when you ausьbst pressure?
Yes I have seen, but there was the diagnosis of giftedness and dyslexia until the fourth grade, go to the school because it was too spдt something. For Glьck my child get a place in a good comprehensive school and blьht to right in the fьnften class. Much was certainly the fact that the elementary school teacher my daughter could not handle their years of Fehleinschдtzung (that is you certainly very familiar).
The Vertrauensverhдltnis to the class teacher of your son seems to have been zerrьttet yes. Is there to change the school's Mцglichkeit? If so, then do that.
Quote by BotterbloomHello!
I mean to simply prevent the teacher to allow such obvious false statements on the decisive nдchsten testimony.With the letter you showed that you took the witness knowledge. Nothing else will & needs school. The signature under the certificate (or a class work) is not your Einverstдndnis closed for the assessment.
I think informed about the legal way you have no chance. In the interest of your child you should you sit down with the teacher / principal and ьberlegen, what can be done closed for him that he shows his Kцnnen at school. Because nothing else can tell the teacher. And I assume her that he just as she describes it, is also in the classroom. Perhaps know to his Mitschьler further details?
Den - auЯerschulischen - intelligence test allowed the teacher ьbrigens not use for evaluation! It is only in the classroom Advance!
And with the child you mьsstest speak. build it, but also stop him to participate in class.
Quote by Botterbloomand mцglicherweise cause only schools I wьrde not choose, ready wдren take him.
.Then just lay in the intelligence test closed for the requested school.
To illustrate the core problem again: The teacher has 2 1/2 years the extensive vocabulary and fluency of the child recognized / praised (although not much else positive was) and now under his plцtzlich a "not altersgemдЯen" Vocabulary.
A dermaЯen rapid deterioration lieЯe not erklдren itself; how could he (who at this age also an intellectual deficit Close lieЯe) develop within six months at this age a Entwicklungsrьckstand? And that said their formulation yes.
It refers not directly to teaching services, but provides a diagnosis informed about its development.
Therefore, I have the strong impression that they simply times mцchte wipe my son or me one.
Quote by neliaYes I have seen, but there was the diagnosis of giftedness and dyslexia until the fourth grade, go to the school because it was too spдt something. For Glьck my child get a place in a good comprehensive school and blьht to right in the fьnften class. Much was certainly the fact that the elementary school teacher my daughter could not handle their years of Fehleinschдtzung (that is you certainly very familiar).
The Vertrauensverhдltnis to the class teacher of your son seems to have been zerrьttet yes. Is there to change the school's Mцglichkeit? If so, then do that.I mцchte my son also happy about a place in a good comprehensive school. Unfortunately, the school, which I far prefer wьrde, getting far more applications than Plдtze, so I befьrchte that any further downside wьrde cut down on the testimony chances dramatically.
I've also been back and herьberlergt whether He might have to change schools. Unfortunately, the primary schools are located in the surrounding neighborhoods, all in deprived areas, which kцnnte create new problems. AuЯerdem I'm afraid that my son rain gerдt to worse, and I still have to take tдgliche travel long distances in buying dafьr. SchlieЯlich you learn only really know the behavior of teachers, if the child is already taught some time.